The Woods
Here is why it doesn't feel like a rush of victory:
"Carcinoma of the pancreas has a markedly increased incidence over the past
several decades and ranks as the fouth leading cause of cancer death in the
United States. Cancer of the exocrine pancreas (which is what I have) is rarely curable and has an overall survival rate of <4%. The highest cure rate occurs if the tumor is truly localized to the pancreas (which mine was not); however this stage of the disease accounts for <20% of cases. For those patients with localized disease and small cancers (<2cm -- not me) with no lymph node metastases (again, not me) and no extension beyond the capsule of the pancreas (again, not me) complete surgical resection can yeild actuarial 5-year survival rates of 18 to 24% (and even if I did fit this profile, that still ain't so great.)
Source
We're not out of the woods yet, folks, though I celebrate each day this side of the dirt.
I tried to post this as a comment, but couldn't. I didn't mean to give it the importance of a post.
Comments
Now, see, that was the stuff you weren't supposed to be reading, remember? The deal was that I pre-read any material that was to be conveyed to you. . . . Geesh, you sick people.
Mark and Ingrida and I had a lovely day going to the farmers' market and then onto a French market - we bought tons of fresh fruit and veggies, pain au chocolat, fresh bread, cheese and saucisson, went to the Meadows, plopped down and (with a very small pocket knife) proceeded to have a delicious lunch. We came back to the flat, slept, read, did mud masks and are now preparing for a birthday party! (Nathan's been helping with the party prep all day). I'm sure you'll hear more about the French market when Nathan and Ingrida visit, so I won't tell you any more about it now!
Oh, I must admit, I've been in love with Edinburgh for a while and I am SOOO enjoying my time here. Not even Mark's trip to the hospital could bring us down! The weather is perfect (as opposed to Haifa's super-muggy, super-sunny, probably hamsim-y {dust in the air}, vaguely edgy climate!), totally mellow, lots of beautiful green grass to walk on and pretty flowers and trees to look at, books to read, and Nathan and Ingrida to spoil us . . . ah, just what a vacation should be! Please do spoil them too - on our behalf. :-) (the beach is a must!)
Posted by: Mara | July 15, 2006 3:28 PM
well now, wasn't that a damned cheerful blog? Still, I know we are not elated as one might expect when given a clean Cat scan result after the past 8 months we've had to endure. Percentages are simple statistics that apply to masses of data and not necessarily masses of tissue. I know that for those in which the therapy works it is close to 100 percent successful. I read too....
Posted by: papa | July 15, 2006 5:01 PM
Sorry, I didn't mean to depress anyone. That was not the point. At first, I couldn't read websites like this; they were too depressing. But as I gradually came to terms with my cancer, I actually find it interesting and even useful. I came to appreciate my outlook when I thought death was immenent (sp?). I was more accepting and savored each moment more. As soon as I got the clean scan info, I started to shift back to my old, cranky ways. And I also think it is important to not let our expectations shift to "Mamma is okay and will live long and prosporous", only to be really shocked should I actually die of this. Daddy is right, too, though. Statistics are masses of data and for those for whom the treatment is effective, it is 100% successful. So I haven't given up hope, but I try to be grounded in reality.
Posted by: ma | July 16, 2006 8:58 AM
Wow! That's kind of fascinating. I think, however, that it's worth noting that any mortality information that you get is going to be at least a few years out of date. The people who have died from this had to undergo operations that were older and based on less knowledge. Cancer is possibly one of the most researched diseases in the world, large gains in knowledge are being constantly made and the efficacy of treatments is usually on the rise.
Posted by: Mendon | July 16, 2006 9:45 PM
Thanks for the optimism. I am always positive, but I have to remember to stay hopeful.
Posted by: Ma | July 17, 2006 10:02 AM
I would like to support Mendon's comments by stating that the studies done to get the information you quoted are 7-10 years old as indicated in the source. Rest assured that we will not be shocked if your health takes a turn for the worse. We will, however, rejoice that you are alive and well now.
Posted by: Rae | July 17, 2006 4:33 PM
And that is what I am trying to do, too. Sometimes I forget.
Posted by: Ma | July 17, 2006 5:14 PM
I went back and checked the sources. The one I found (http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2006PWSecured.pdf) is from 2006. It's the first one in the list. Still has a survival rate of 4%. Sorry.
Posted by: Ma | July 17, 2006 5:27 PM
It's from 1997. The number following the sentence corresponds to the information.
Posted by: Rachael | July 17, 2006 8:40 PM
Right, I am referring to number one on their list. They didn't site it, but the data in is still good, relevant, etc.
Posted by: ma | July 17, 2006 10:48 PM
Okay, let's think this through. (I think this is what y'all have been trying to tell me.) By necessity, five year survival statistics only can involve people diagnosed and treated five years ago. Okay, okay, I finally get it.
Posted by: ma | July 17, 2006 10:54 PM
I just came from seeing Dr. Henderson. He is moving away from performing surgery and more into administrative duties. I talked to him. What he said that the longer I survive, the more likely I will survive. He was pleased with my scan and my progress and will see me again (actually, Conrad Smphendorfer will see me again) in another year.
Posted by: Ma | July 18, 2006 12:28 PM
All's well that wends well.....or is it ends well? I see! Bother that cat!
Posted by: papa | July 18, 2006 5:54 PM
Okay, I feel a little like I'm intruding here because all the posts are from your immediate family. If I am, I'm really sorry, but I wanted to say of couple of things and I've never been exactly shy. So...
First, I want to congratulate you on a clean scan and tell you how happy I am that you're doing well. I understand that there is still a great deal that concerns you and that anything is possible, but I'm so glad that you are well TODAY.
Second, Sadie and Josh and I have been filling a number of our Saturdays with picnics in the park or time at the beach. If you ever have the urge to hang out with a precocious three-year-old and her neurotic parents (and who doesn't?), there's always room for one or two more.
Third, you so totally rock! Sure, it's not the most eloquent or educated thing to say, but it is so completely true.
Posted by: Tricia | July 19, 2006 9:10 PM
Maman & Papa, order: take Tricia up on her picnic/beach time, please?! You know, as my stand-in :-)
Thanks for finding me, T. Erm, Maman, would you call her and give me my email address? Oh, yeah, and since you're calling her you can plan the next picnic :-)
Love to everyone!
Posted by: Mara | July 20, 2006 5:51 AM