« News | Main | More News! »

Same input, different reaction

I was listening to NPR the day after the State of the Union speech.

To be honest, I didn't listen to the speech. There is something about our president's tone of voice, cadence, inflection or something that drives me wild, and not in a good way. I just can not bear to listen to the man for more than about 7 minutes before I just want to shut him off. I have actually read some of his speeches (or parts of them) later and found what he said much less offensive. I think it is sort of like the kids-with-dirty-faces syndrome I suffer from. Anyway . . .

I am commenting on the commentary, not the original.

They were commenting on the Social Security Reform.
They were saying how Social Security was part of FDR's New Deal and how Republicans hated it as big brother government in people's business so they wanted to dismantle it or at least take the teeth out of it.

Now, I was raised by a staunch Republican. How staunch? Well, my father thought John Birch was just a little too left leaning for his tastes. Seriously, my parents would have voted for George Wallace (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace) if they had felt that he had a real chance of winning. They, correctly, felt that a vote for George Wallace was just going to take votes away from Goldwater. Add to this that my father was a voting Republican during the time of FDR, and before, for that matter. For him the Depression and the New Deal were not the stuff of history books, but part of his life. For him the emotions about FDR were real and current, not remote and formed in response to reading about what happened long ago and far away.

So I have long mistrusted Social Security. Along with listening to my father, there have plenty of articles about how there isn't enough money in the system, etc, how people are living longer, the system is going to be bankrupt about the time I want to retire, etc. You've read them too.

Add to this the fact that I have not worked in the private sector for long enough to be eligible for any benefits, except widow's benefits and that requires Daddy's death. Not something I am planning on. He will outlive us all.

Anyway, according to the commentary on NPR, Bush's response to big government being in people's business and taking money for their retirement is to allow the younger contributors to have control over their share of the money they pay into the system. Or at least a portion of it.

Now, my response, and the one that I think more accurately reflects my father's philosophy, is to make sure that I have saved for my retirement. Yes, independently of the Government and Social Security. Not everyone can afford to do that, you say? Yes, that is true. That is why we have Social Security. But it was designed for those who truly could not afford it, not as an entitlement, a reward for having outlasted one's peers. It started out as not much, just enough to keep the wolf from the door. It was never meant to be the sole support of anyone. And can't afford it? Well, if I had spent the money that is tucked away for our retirement, our lifestyle might have been different. But who would have taken care of us in our old age? Any volunteers? I thought not. By then you will have families of your own, student loans, etc. And that is as it should be.

Anyway, enough of this rant. I guess I was just having trouble seeing how giving people control over the money the Government collects from them (not voluntarily) is really the Government getting out of people's lives.

PS. I know I have included long annoying links to other websites. I am hoping this will inspire someone (any volunteers?) to tell me how to make them neater.

Comments

hmmm, interesting to think about. The way i've been looking at social security, as of now, is don't expect anything to be around when I get to that age. you're father was right. we do need to have money saved for when we get old because otherwise, since our culture doesn't pay people to be wise and actualized, we'll starve. Largely, I don't plan to grow old in these united states. I have a job to do and it's not catering to a wretchedly crumbling old world system. I view social security as a tax, nothing more. goodbye money. then I move on.

If there is no cute little "http" button next to cute "i" button next to a cute "b" button at the top of your screen when you write a new entry, well, then, ask somebody else how to enter urls.

Well, there is a cute "url" button next to the cute "i" and cute "b" buttons, but what is is suppposed to do? I clicked on it and then I don't know what to do next. Boy, do I feel dumb. And Merry just asked me to figure out the tape dispenser, since "you are the technology person." Scary, isn't it?

Okay, once you have highlighted a word or phrase that you want to use as your clickable link, click on 'url', enter the link (http: etc.), and you should be good to go.

So much for that little experiment! Boy, did I screw things up, but good! Wow! I'm impressed with myself.

Well, Ma, if it helps any I have to show my Teacher how to attatch files to e-mails, how to shut down programs through trask manager instead of just shutting everything down. In addition you will notice that I don't even try to post websites or links!

Isn't it ironic? But doesn't make you feel good that you actually know more than you give yourself credit for?

Post a comment